Like many of our investment management colleagues, at Principal Real Estate Investors we have noticed increased interest and questions from our investors on the topic of climate risk, whether through informal discussions or detailed RFP inquiries. The topic has definitely emerged as a new – and probably permanent – aspect of our fiduciary duty and what it means to assess, disclose and manage these risks to our real estate investments.
Recognizing the need to better understand and disclose risks
associated with climate change, several industry initiatives have started to
incorporate climate risk and resilience questions into reporting frameworks. In
particular, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) Task Force on Climate-Related
Financial Disclosures (TCFD) seeks to stimulate market dialogue and increased
transparency on climate-related risks by providing information to investors,
lenders, insurers, and other stakeholders. TCFD’s work and recommendations are
meant to cultivate market dialogue on climate change risks, and encourage
companies and investment managers to align their disclosures with investors’
needs. As of February 2019, over 580
companies, responsible for over $100 trillion of assets, have expressed support
for the TCFD recommendations.
Principal is currently evaluating the TCFD recommendations
and considering applying its guidance to investment management, reporting, and
stakeholder engagement practices. As a
preliminary exploration of what this level of analysis and disclosure means, we
recently initiated a pilot climate risk assessment of the assets in one of our
private equity funds, with the objective of building organizational capacity on
this topic, and positioning ourselves to better serve the needs of our
investors in the future.
We are currently wrapping up the first phase of our TCFD
disclosure pilot, which includes drafting language to summarize our
findings. In doing so, we have learned
many valuable lessons on the challenges and nuances of climate risk issues. We have taken an important first step in
developing the institutional knowledge necessary to be able hold meaningful
discussions on the impact of climate risks on our real estate investments, and
have a clearer idea of how to tackle these complicated questions going forward.
As a result, we would like to share the following key
lessons with our peers and colleagues in the industry, so that collectively we
can all work together to develop best practices on climate risk and TCFD, and
move these important topics forward on behalf of our client and investors:
Don’t Overthink It.
The topic of climate risk and
TCFD can seem daunting and overwhelming.
How do you deal with such diverse technical questions as sea level rise,
drought, or wildfires – many of which operate on different timelines or can
have wildly different financial impacts on a building. However, with regards to TCFD, one must step
back and remember the overall objective.
TCFD simply is a risk analysis framework, no more, no less. In real estate we are always analyzing risks
– market risks, credit risks for tenants, economic risks, seismic risks, etc. –
and TCFD is an addition to this list.
First, you collect information, consult with experts, look at data, and
conduct your analysis. Then, you share your
findings with stakeholders and determine if investment management practices
need to change, or other responses are merited.
When put in that context, the idea of climate risk assessment and
disclosure feels more manageable.
Separate Assessment from Response.
In our pilot, it was important
for us to separate three key concepts in our minds – assessment, disclosure,
and response. Each of these activities
is distinct, and an important part of dealing with climate risk issues. Assessment is simply the identification of
risks. Disclosure is the communication
of the risks identified, and response is acting to minimize, mitigate, or
resolve the risks. TCFD is focused on
the assessment and disclosure of risks – it does not actually require you to
discuss your responses. I like to think
of TCFD as a conversation starter – putting data and information in front of
our stakeholders. What comes next is working
with our internal staff, property teams, investors, and clients to identify and
implement our strategies to respond.
Taking each phase in a sequential order – assessment, disclosure, and
response – brings clarity to the process and improves organizational thinking.
Don’t Sweat the Scenarios.
When you first begin to explore the
literature and research on climate risk analysis, you quickly encounter the
concept of scenarios. Essentially, with
climate risk assessments you need to make an assumption on the amount of carbon
that will accumulate in our atmosphere, which in turn drives the frequency,
intensity, and overall risk profile of various climate related outcomes. These scenarios are defined by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and are often referred to by a “Representative
Concentration Pathway”, each with a different assumption on when and at
what level carbon concentrations will stabilize. The science behind these scenarios can be
dense and hard to navigate, and it may at first seem that you need to account
for every different scenario.
Fortunately, for most investment real estate, the scenarios don’t matter
that much in the short term. Most of the
scenarios have a similar profile in the next 7-15 years before diverging. This means that as long as the hold period
for your real estate investments are within that timeframe, you can essentially
pick any one scenario and proceed with your analysis. Only for longer term investment horizons
should you conduct a multi-scenario assessment.
Our conclusion – pick a scenario, be prepared to discuss why you
selected that one, and don’t worry about the others for now.
Recognize the Many Dimensions of Risk.
Climate risks come in many
flavors and intensities, and to adequately assess your risks you need to
understand the different ways climate change can influence a real estate
investment. TCFD clearly defines several
risk categories to assess and disclose – from transition risks (risks
associated with how climate change can alter regulations, technologies,
economic conditions, or market assumptions) to physical or operational risks
due to climate-related weather events.
But it can get more detailed from there – is an investment exposed to a certain risk such as
sea-level rise? If so, then you need to
understand the probability of that
risk occurring, and then the severity
of the economic impact should an event occur.
Further, risks should be evaluated both in terms of the physical risk of
a specific asset and the overall allocation risk of the fund or portfolio at
large. It’s one question to determine
that a building is exposed to hurricanes by being located on the gulf
coast. It’s another question to determine
that your entire fund is overexposed to hurricanes and sea-level rise.
Decipher the Data.
New data providers, models, and
resources offer a wealth of climate risk information to aid in your
assessment. But it is important to
understand the limitations of each data source, and the nature of what that
information can – and cannot – tell you.
First, understand that climate change fundamentally disrupts many older,
historic datasets. Resources that are
backward looking or rely on historic data (such as FEMA maps) may not actually
be able to fully describe your risk.
Take time to understand the nature of your data. Is it historically based? Is it a forecast? What is the time horizon of the model, and
does that align with your investment hold period? Lastly, what is the unit of geographic
measure? If your dataset details risks
at the county level – is that accurate enough?
We had a building flagged as being highly exposed to wildfires – yet the
building was located in the urban core of large East Coast city. It turned out that the data model we utilized
was only able to flag risks at a county scale.
Rural forests outside of the city triggered the risk, but when we
investigated, we determined that wildfire risk was not material to that
asset. The data is useful and key – but
only if you understand what it is actually telling you.
Manage what is Material.
Perhaps the most challenging part
of assessing climate risks is determining what risks are material and relevant
to the investment thesis. Does the
timeline align with the hold period? How
are increasing heat waves going to impact an office building? Is increased storm activity a new risk, or
the extension of a previously known risk?
This is the point that we are currently at with our analysis, examining
the risk assessment data and looking building by building to determine if they
are actually a threat to the investment proforma, and if so, what are
appropriate response strategies.
Disclose and then Discuss.
Ultimately, TCFD is about putting
better information in the hands of investors and stakeholders, allowing for
more informed discussions and dialogue on the impacts of climate change. It’s an important starting point for us all,
as we each are learning how to grapple with climate risk questions and how to
fulfil our fiduciary responsibilities in the face of much uncertainty. Only by conducting these assessments, sharing
results, and discussing the implications together can we arrive at thoughtful
Through our TCFD pilot, we have taken an important step in
better understanding how to examine climate risks from a real estate investment
management perspective. Yet, we still
have much to learn, and I do not doubt that industry expectations, resources,
data, and reporting practices will continue to evolve on this topic. We at Principal Real Estate Investors look
forward to collaborating with our peers and colleagues further on this topic,
and continuing to share lessons and best practices as they emerge.
This article is for
discussion and educational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a
forecast, research or investment advice, a recommendation, offer or
solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy.
Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. References to specific
securities, asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes
only and should not be relied upon as a primary basis for an investment
decision. Rather, an assessment should be made as to whether the information is
appropriate in individual circumstances before making an investment decision.
Potential investors should be aware of the risks inherent to owning and
investing in real estate, including: value fluctuations, capital market pricing
volatility, liquidity risks, leverage, credit risk, occupancy risk and legal
risk. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of
the reader. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal.
This article is written by Jennifer McConkey, Senior Director – Operations and Sustainability, Principal Real Estate Investors