RM2.2: Social Risk Assessment - Design

Maximum Score

Determined by materiality

Prefill

Eligible

Validation

Evidence and Other answer are manually validated

2026 Updates

None


Has the entity performed a social risk assessment(s) for the design of the asset within the last three years?

Assessment Instructions

Intent: What is the purpose of this indicator?

The intent of this indicator is to assess the forward-looking, life-cycle-oriented risk assessment process for social risks that generates insights into the identified and potential risks at the beginning of the project—in the design phase – which allow the entity to identify, analyze, evaluate and treat the risks the project will be exposed to across its life cycle.

Input: How do I complete this indicator?

Select Yes or No: If selecting 'Yes', select applicable sub-options.

Elements of risk assessment process: Select one of the available options. These have been aligned with the ISO 31000 Risk Management standard.

Material social issues: Select all issues that are covered by the entity’s risk assessment process(es). It is possible to report using the ‘Other’ answer option. Ensure that the ‘Other’ answer provided is not a duplicate or subset of another option. It is possible to report multiple ‘Other’ answers.

Terminology

Child labor

Work that deprives children of their childhood, their potential and their dignity, and that is harmful to their physical or mental development including by interfering with their education. Specifically, it means types of work that are not permitted for children below the relevant minimum age.

Community

Persons or groups of persons living and/or working in any areas that are economically, socially or environmentally impacted (positively or negatively) by an entity’s ope

Contractors

Persons or organizations working onsite or offsite on behalf of an entity. A contractor can contract their own workers directly, or contract sub-contractors or independent contractors.

Community development

Actions to minimize, mitigate, or compensate for adverse social and/or economic impacts, and/or to identify opportunities or actions to enhance positive impacts on individuals/groups living or working in areas that are affected/could be affected by the organization's activities

Customer satisfaction

Customer satisfaction is one measure of an entity's sensitivity to its customers’ needs and preferences and, from an organizational perspective, is essential for long-term success. In the context of sustainability, customer satisfaction provides insight into how the entity approaches its relationship with one stakeholder group (customers).

Human capital

Human capital refers to the knowledge, culture, skills, experience, and overall contributions of an organization’s workforce. It encompasses strategies for fairly attracting, developing, and retaining talent, fostering a productive and engaged workplace, and ensuring fair and effective workforce management. Many organizational approaches can contribute to human capital objectives, including talent development & advancement; skills-based hiring & development; and diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Employee engagement

An employee's involvement with, commitment to and satisfaction with the entity.

Forced or compulsory labor

All work or service which is exacted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered themselves voluntarily.

Freedom of association

Right of employers and workers to form, to join and to run their own organizations without prior authorization or interference by the state or any other entity.

Health and safety

Protecting the entity's stakeholders from harm or death due to injury or disease. Often, this is executed by developing policy, analyzing and controlling health and safety risks, providing training, and recording and investigating health and safety incidents.

Labor standards and working conditions

Labor standards and working conditions are at the core of paid work and employment relationships. Working conditions cover a broad range of topics and issues, from working time (hours of work, rest periods, and work schedules) to remuneration, as well as the physical conditions and mental demands that exist in the workplace.

Local employment

Providing jobs and skills to local people as employees, and to local contractors.

Risk analysis

Studying probabilities and consequences given the existing controls, to identify the level of residual risk.

Risk assessment

Careful examination of the factors that could potentially adversely impact the value or longevity of an infrastructure asset. The results of the assessment assist in identifying measures that have to be implemented in order to prevent and mitigate the risks.

Risk evaluation

Comparing risk analysis results with risk criteria to determine whether the residual risk is tolerable.

Risk identification

Identifying what could prevent an organization from achieving their objectives.

Risk treatment

Control / mitigation of the risk.

Social enterprise partnering

An entity's partnerships with organizations that have social objectives that serve as the primary purpose of the organization.

Stakeholder relations

The practice of forging mutually beneficial connections with third-party groups and indivduals that have a stake in common interest.

Supply chain

Range of activities carried out by organizations upstream from the reporting entity (i.e. with whom the entity has an indirect commercial relationship), which provide products or services that are used in the development of the entity's own products or services.

Users

Users are people that interact physically with the asset when they use its services.

Validation: What evidence is required?

Evidence

The evidence provided will be subject to manual validation.

Evidence does not necessarily need to be provided in full. Rather, the evidence needs to be sufficient to verify the existence of the claimed risk assessment for each issue.

The provided evidence must include the following elements:

  • Confirms that a social risk assessment was conducted and clearly presents the outcomes of the risk assessment.

  • Includes all selected elements of the risk assessment process, for all selected social issues, highlighting or bringing attention to these where possible.

  • Include all selected social issues within the assessment, highlighting or bringing attention to these where possible.

  • Relates to an assessment that has taken place within the last three years, up to and including the end of the reporting year identified in EC4.

Evidence examples may include but are not limited to:

  • Documents or section of documents, in their original or redacted form, such as:

    • Corporate risk registers

    • Social aspects and impacts registers

    • H&S inspections and audits

    • Employee surveys

    • Monitoring reports

    • Annual reports

    • Social impact assessments

    • Social management plans/reports

    • Meeting minutes or company presentations

  • Procedure or process document(s) (e.g. from a risk management system) when supported with documentation that details the outcome of the risk assessment for selected issues.

See below for an example of a risk register structure:

Risk identification
Risk analysis
Risk evaluation and treatment

Social issues

Risk description

Risk rating

Mitigation measures

Likelihood / Consequence / Rating

The GRESB / B Capital Due Diligence tool (ESG DD Tool) contains such a register in the sheet named "ESG Risk & Opps Assessment". Contractor and/or operator engagement: In some cases, an indicator addresses an activity that applies to the reporting entity, yet is undertaken by an assigned contractor, operator and/or contracted entity. This is often the case, for example, for PPP type arrangements. In these cases, when providing evidence, the participant should specify the entity undertaking the activity and the relationship to that entity, to verify how these actions are applicable to the reporting entity. Copies of redacted contractual agreements/clauses to verify these relationships are acceptable.

Other Answer

The ‘Other’ answer provided will be subject to manual validation.

Add a response that applies to the entity but is not already listed. Ensure that the ‘Other’ answer provided is not a duplicate or subset of another option (e.g. “recycling” when “‘Waste” is selected). It is possible to report multiple ‘Other’ answers. If multiple ‘Other’ answers are listed, more than one may be accepted in manual validation.

Validation Basics

Scoring

Scoring: How does GRESB score this indicator?

Materiality-based scoring

The scoring of this indicator is equal to the sum of the fractions assigned to the selected options and respective sub-options, multiplied by the total score of the indicator. The fractional points assigned to each option depend on their material relevance (as determined by the GRESB Materiality Assessment).

The entity must select all issues of ‘Medium relevance’ and ‘High relevance’ to obtain the maximum score.

Specific materiality weightings are assigned to the entity for each sustainability issue. The weightings are set at one of four levels for each of the issues:

  • No relevance (scoring weight: 0)

  • Low relevance (scoring weight: 0)

  • Medium relevance (scoring weight: 1)

  • High relevance (scoring weight: 2)

The scoring of this indicator is equal to the fraction assigned to the selected option, multiplied by the total score of the indicator.

Evidence

The evidence is manually validated and assigned a multiplier, according to the table below. The evidence must support the validation requirements. If any requirements are not met, the evidence may be partially accepted or not accepted, depending on the level of alignment with the requirements.

Validation Status
Multiplier

Accepted

2/2

Partially Accepted

1/2

Not Accepted

0

Other

The 'Other' answer is manually validated and assigned a score, which is used as a score multiplying factor as outlined below:

Validation status
Score

Accepted

1/1

Not Accepted

0

Duplicate

0

Scoring Basics


References

Get Support: Solution Providers

GRESB Solution Providers are independent, third-party organizations within the GRESB Partner network that offer specialized products, tools, and services to support sustainability performance outside the GRESB Assessment process.

Currently, there are no GRESB Solution Providers associated with this indicator.

GRESB will continue to update this section as the GRESB Solution Provider network grows. Please check back regularly to find GRESB Solution Providers who can support your sustainability performance.

Last updated

Was this helpful?