Infrastructure Assessments
Not sure where to start?
How are the assessments organized?
The GRESB Infrastructure Assessment framework breaks down portfolio evaluation into increasingly detailed levels:
Assessment Levels
Component
The highest-level category in the assessment. Each component represents a broad area of sustainability evaluation (e.g., management, performance, development).
The Infrastructure Fund Assessment is made of only one Management Component. The Infrastructure Asset and Development Asset Assessments, which funds’ underlying assets complete, include Performance and Development Components (respectively) that may contribute to a fund’s overall GRESB Score
Aspect
Each component is made up of several aspects, which group together related themes. For example, within the Management component, there are aspects such as Policies, Reporting, and Risk Management. Note that the SFDR Assessments do not contain aspects.
Indicator
The most detailed level of the hierarchy. Indicators are specific, measurable questions used to assess performance within an aspect (e.g., “Has the entity set GHG reduction targets aligned with Net Zero?”).
Fund Assessment
*The Performance and Development Components are part of the Infrastructure Asset and Development Asset Assessment, respectively.
Asset Assessment
Component
Max Score
40 Points
60 Points
Unscored
Development Asset Assessment
SFDR Fund
SFDR Asset
Last updated
Was this helpful?