Peer Group Formation
Introduction
GRESB assigns each participant to a peer group to contextualize their assessment results. Peer groups do not influence the GRESB Score, Star Rating, or points achieved, but help to put the GRESB Score into perspective relative to similar peers.
Every reporting entity can see the characteristics of its pre-defined peer group within its Benchmark Report.
Peer Group Formation
GRESB determines an entity’s peer group using a simple, consistent set of quantitative rules. The tables below illustrate the peer group creation process for the Infrastructure Fund, Asset, and Development Asset Assessments.
Each row in the table represents one ‘trial.’ The trial checks whether enough GRESB participants possess that row’s combination of characteristics.
If there are not sufficient entities with shared characteristics, one of the characteristics (e.g., region) will be removed from consideration.
GRESB will only create the entity’s peer group once:
Six entities (the participant + five peers) match that combination, and
Fewer than 50% of the entities in that group belong to the same company/fund
The peer group allocation methodology moves from most to least specific when testing combinations of characteristics.
For location, these are (in order of sequence/specificity): country, subregion, region, and super-region/global.
The country, subregion, and region are defined using the UN country classification guidelines available here. The only super-regions used are Asia Pacific, grouped from Asia (code 142 in the UN classification) and Oceania (code 142 in the UN classification).
For the sector, the most specific starting point is the subclass, followed by class, and finally super-class/diversified.
Last updated
Was this helpful?

