Would You Risk the Planet’s Fate on a ‘Coin Toss’?
Published on 3 August 2018
The climate coin toss: Has your business set carbon reduction targets that only have a 50% chance of preventing a catastrophe?
The Science-Based Targets Initiative is helping companies to set carbon targets to achieve the Paris Agreement’s ‘2ºC’ goal, but their approach gives just a 50% chance of success. Can we risk the fate of the planet on a coin toss?
Greenhouse gas emissions from human activity are rising and pushing up average global temperatures. In 2015, the global mean temperature reached 1ºC above pre-industrial levels for the first time.[1] If the Earth warms by 2ºC or more, the results for the planet and society will be catastrophic.
At the Paris Agreement, 195 countries committed to the overall goal of not exceeding 2ºC.
The Science-Based Targets Initiative (SBTI) is helping the corporate world to set decarbonisation targets in line with the Paris Agreement. However, their approach gives just a 50% chance of success. Would you risk the planet’s fate on a ‘coin toss’? We believe that business can go further, and set targets that give at least an 80% chance of avoiding a 2ºC rise.
We recommend corporates do seek SBTI approval for their carbon-cutting plans but set targets which are significantly more ambitious than SBTI’s current minimum.
Find out more aboutVerco’s work in science-based target setting here (https://www.vercoglobal.com/sbt). [1] https://climateanalytics.org/briefings/global-warming-reaches-1c-above-preindustrial-warmest-in-more-than-11000-years.html
Related insights
Articles
Navigating climate risk management: Strategies and steps for real estate organizations
Demystifying climate risk and the TCFD recommendations
Understanding your organization’s climate-related risks and opportunities has never been more critical. The most recent report from the UN’s IPCC on Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability is a review of climate impacts and how much we can adapt to them.
EPC Grades or Actual Energy Use? Grappling with Net-Zero Chalk and Cheese
Radical improvements in the energy efficiency of existing buildings are needed if we are to reach net zero. But should their performance be assessed by their EPC grade or actual operational energy use? Both are the answer, but these are chalk and cheese, so property owners and investors must learn to deal with two very different agendas.
